Hundred thousand FLINTAS
How mothers are also abolishing themselves this year in line with the patriarchy
It was Mother's Day, and for another year, the women who have hijacked feminism in Germany for their submissive kink are busy voluntarily making themselves invisible. The day before yesterday, Saturday, they took to the streets of Berlin as ‘Hundred Thousand Mothers.’ The symbol of submission in political Islam – the hijab – was followed by the Progress Pride Flag, under which women and lesbians have been viciously attacked for years. There was an awareness team, and speeches wondered why ‘people with uteruses’ and ‘FLINTA’ (German acronym for Women, Lesbians, Intersex, Nonbinary, Trans, Agender) were not being heard. Tragically, I can say that I am glad that not a hundred thousand mothers stood behind the message of the event.
With every speech centred around women and mothers, every effort was made not to forget anyone. After all, we've been taught for years by hip Instagram stars and bestselling Spiegel authors that it's terribly hostile to only talk about women, girls and mothers. Firstly, men can be women. And secondly, women can be men. They could be extremely hurt by the simple existence of women and mothers talking about themselves and their bodies and experiences. And then we forgot that in the 80s and 90s there was simply no such thing as non-binary. How unbelievably hostile those times were, when adverts still showed wild girls in trousers playing Lego, when we lay topless in the outdoor pool as a matter of course and when pop stars broke sex role stereotypes without amputating body parts and denying their sex!
It's not entirely clear what the awareness team was supposed to be responsible for. It certainly wasn't responsible when a female rapper wanted to sing in front of children about how she likes to be penetrated anally. How fitting that the Instagram account of a hundred thousand mothers had previously shared the trans activist Alok Vaid-Manon, who believes that even little girls can have sexual fetishes and therefore men should be allowed access to women's toilets and not make such a fuss.
The change in this account from ‘putting mothers at the centre’ to ‘everyone is somehow a mother* and everyone can identify as a mother’ was certainly remarkable (the gender star is used in German language to marginalize women and include men). In the end, it was all about care work, which everyone would do, ‘FLINTA with care responsibility’ and, of course, diversity, which they wanted to make visible. It was also suddenly all about the coveted pots from Demokratie leben (this is a state funded program to “strengthen democracy” – AKA deliver green-leftwing-friendly demonstrations on demand). A poster with a guy holding a baby in his arms read: ‘Motherhood has no sex’.
I suspect that the awareness team was supposed to protect the demo from radical feminists - the TERFs and SWERFs who have been defamed and insulted for years, who know very well who a woman and mother is and have absolutely no interest in selling off their own sex class, their own language and their own bodies and certainly not their own children as an arbitrary and purchasable consumer good.
The same awareness had previously ensured that the same TERFs and SWERFs and groups that were somehow associated with them at some point were excluded from discussions and collaborations. As usual with Instagram pseudo-feminists, they only wanted to be applauded, admired and affirmed on their own accounts and not be associated with the wrong women. The good reputation, the good vibes ... you know? And actually, none of that matters if we just stick together against Donald Trump and the ‘right’.
They didn't want to engage in a discourse about their own misalignment and lost compass. When I started a discussion under a post by a woman I had previously held in high regard, I was accused of slandering. But the Hundred Thousand Mothers account - run by Manja Liehr - then confirmed that she thinks men can be women and is in favour of men's legal right to access a women's shelter. They then endeavoured - even with a blog post - to smooth everything over and confirm Liehr's view that it really doesn't matter who is a woman and a mother. So it was simply about having a nice happening and generating a community feeling among the crème de la crème of Instagram traitors with huge followings - under disembodied flying breasts and angel wings on a pink background.
These circles are very sweet and friendly as long as you dutifully submit to the neo-theology of ‘everyone is a woman who identifies as a woman’ and ‘we are all inclusive - or intersectional’. But as soon as you dare to remind people of the really harsh realities that women are threatened by such arbitrary attitudes and policies because of their damn sex, you'd rather not hear it anymore. That's when the ‘awareness’ is switched on. I was in these circles and know what it's like to fall out of them. And now I'm experiencing how women who I valued go the other way round and allow themselves to be downright corrupted - I can no longer call it anything else.
I can now be criticised for being so cynical. I realise that it is simply the way of these women to come to terms with the circumstances - in a less confrontational and pleasing way. It is the ‘Loving to Survive’ that Dee L.R. Graham so aptly analysed. In this, they are very similar to the Tradwifes or the right-wing conservative housewives from whom they are so keen to distance themselves. How fitting that Mareice Kaiser should write a bestseller entitled ‘Ich weiß es doch auch nicht’ (‘I don't know either’). Before she published ‘Das Unwohlsein der modernen Mutter’ (‘The modern mother's malaise’) shortly after my book “Mutterwut Muttermut“ (mother’s rage, mother’s bravery), which was of course completely cancelled. They all want to write about mothers and their oppression and minutes later, they make mothers invisible again so that no man feels hurt. The latest podcast is appropriately called ‘Happy F*cking mother's day’.
They are right to be angry - you could hear that at the demo. But they don't even get to the point of analysing the origin and root of the structures WHY they are so angry. They don't want to hear anything from Adrienne Rich, who did a radical feminist analysis of all aspects of motherhood back in the 90s in ‘Of women Born’. Every human being is born of a woman. Women are oppressed because they have the potential to give birth to human beings - a power that no man will ever have and which men have always envied in women.
They don't even want to know what the patriarchy is that they keep talking about, how and when it came about and how we got to this point where we are now. Because then they would have to recognise sex as a class and see that fatherhood and father’s rights are the origin of the patriarchal oppression of women and girls.
Nothing changes when a man declares himself a woman. The psychological and financial violence, the gaslighting that women and children suffer in their own homes with such men is ignored. Who wants to be confronted with the fact that these men throw the family income out the window for their sissy porn fetish and force their wife and children to address him as ‘mother’, redefine the mother as a lesbian and otherwise continue to do no housework? They also don't want to know about the women who are locked up with sex offenders and paedo criminals.
They also still believe that their problems would be solved if only men would finally get involved. They simply ignore the fact that this only works to a limited extent and that the attempt to make themselves completely superfluous backfires the moment a woman ends up in family court or at the youth welfare office with the great daddy because she wants to separate due to domestic violence and abuse. Fathers' rights activists have soaked up the arguments of feminists who conform to capitalism like champagne. After all, we want equality and mothers are not important at all. That is “Mutterkult“ (cult around mothers) and therefore Nazi. So the newborn should be transplanted quickly into the alternating model and will of course be split 50/50. The rest of the time we put the baby in overcrowded daycare centres. Otherwise it will suffer from a lack of education from infancy. In any case, Der Spiegel has already written twice that fathers are the better mothers. Whether the child wants all this is irrelevant. If the children suffer, the mother has influenced the child badly and the paedophile myth of Parental Alientation Syndrome is being reeled off. Woman and child are hostages of these men. For many long years. Institutionalised violence extends the perpetrator's arm into infinity. This doesn't look so good on a pink demo of well-off gender studies academics who still believe that everything is different with their husband.
In the meantime, things have gone so far that men can now conveniently order babies - even as single men and without verification. A paedo-criminal can live his dream and of course he does - even in the middle of Berlin. Mothers are literally only needed as walking ovaries and uteri that can be rented. How convenient that they have already dehumanised themselves as such and are helping to promote it as progressive and queer diversity.
Funnily enough, this is somehow reconciled with the fact that mothers have to breastfeed for at least 2 years, practise nappy-free and family beds in order to provide the child with a non-violent, species-appropriate and needs-oriented upbringing. This needs-orientated upbringing includes confirming a child in the lie that it could be born in the wrong body and giving it medication that is also given to sex offenders for chemical castration. Puberty as a disease. Anyone who opposes this will then be disinvited from the Attachment Parenting Congress with fond words. After all, human bisexuality is a right-wing narrative and ‘You spoke to the wrong woman in public and criticised the Self-Determination Act. XYZ has a trans child. You shouldn't frighten these great circles’. We'd rather not talk about the fact that girls in their circles amputate their healthy breasts by the dozen and tolerate the most horrific mutilations. This is need-orientated and a heroic deed. And under no circumstances do you pick up a radical feminist book that has been analysing all this suffering for decades. Such books are strictly forbidden in these circles.
You could ignore it all or just laugh about it. But the bitter thing is that all the major women's organisations in this country are behind such confused women. They have been busy for years betraying everything that autonomous feminists have fought really hard for before them and are pocketing a lot of taxpayers' money and sitting in publicly funded positions. It culminated in them all backing a self-determination law, removing sex as an important legal category for women's rights. They are currently continuing to fight for a legal entitlement for men in women's shelters and trivialise the untenable situation, which is contrary to human rights, of women being locked up with male offenders in the middle of Germany. Anything that doesn't fit into the ‘trans women are women’ mantra is marginalised as trans-hostile - a paradise for extremists and perpetrators.
I am of the opinion that these women should no longer hold these positions, as they cannot responsibly defend the rights of women, girls and mothers as our Basic Law stipulates. They are ideologues and their unrealistic belief in pink angel mothers, bodiless breasts and rainbow-coloured non-binary fairytale princes is allowed. After all, we have freedom of belief. But they should no longer hold offices in which they are allowed to speak on behalf of women and children who have been severely traumatised by male violence. It is not their right to impose their beliefs and mantras on all other women and take all women into their kink of submission. If they have no problem with men in women's spaces, that's their business. But they do not have the right to betray the rights of all women, girls and mothers. Because these rights are there especially for the women who are afraid to say no.
Women, girls and mothers have really serious problems to deal with in this country. We have a femicide almost every day. The numbers of domestic violence are exploding. We are Europe's brothel and now also Europe's gender clinic for self-inflicted serious bodily harm - especially of girls. The legalisation of the reproductive exploitation of women and child trafficking via egg donation and surrogate motherhood has been on the doorstep for years. Despite a ban on advertising, this has been practised for years at baby buying fairs in the centre of Germany.
Women are losing their security, their rights, their language, their spaces, their physical autonomy, their dignity, their lives, their children. The situation for women in this country is truly serious. The ideologues who are downright ashamed of being women and mothers must urgently lose their influence over other women.