The insistence on the essential existence of “women” as a category is powerful – but do you see risks in how patriarchy polices even these boundaries? How do we recognize lived suffering without fueling gatekeeping? Would love if you could check out my piece https://vostrength.substack.com/p/is-arranged-marriage-just-pimping?r=3alikv and any of my other posts on women’s autonomy, and share your thoughts!
The insistence on the essential existence of “women” as a category is powerful – but do you see risks in how patriarchy polices even these boundaries? How do we recognize lived suffering without fueling gatekeeping? Would love if you could check out my piece "Arranged Marriage = Legal Trafficking, No Cap" and any of my other posts on women’s autonomy, and share your thoughts!
The insistence on the essential existence of “women” as a category is powerful – but do you see risks in how patriarchy polices even these boundaries? How do we recognize lived suffering without fueling gatekeeping? Would love if you could check out my piece https://vostrength.substack.com/p/is-arranged-marriage-just-pimping?r=3alikv and any of my other posts on women’s autonomy, and share your thoughts!
The insistence on the essential existence of “women” as a category is powerful – but do you see risks in how patriarchy polices even these boundaries? How do we recognize lived suffering without fueling gatekeeping? Would love if you could check out my piece "Arranged Marriage = Legal Trafficking, No Cap" and any of my other posts on women’s autonomy, and share your thoughts!
It is not "gatekeeping" to protect women and girls from male violence.